• magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    Issues like this make me wonder: what’s acceptable to joke about now that future generations will find shameful? Any suggestions, folks?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      Some people are starting to shift their opinions on it, but jokes about men being raped (especially in prison) are weirdly accepted.

      • Gnome Kat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I was thinking this binging The Boys recently. In universe apparently fish can communicate with each other and have feelings and shit, there is a dude who can talk to fish. But they also show a weird amount of casual fish abuse in relation to that character and in a way that sorta plays it for laughs. The Boys is already pretty satirical so I think the writers are doing it on purpose to satirize real life animal mistreatment but even still I’m not sure it’s done that well as its still presented in a lot of scenes as a joke.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          they do that because in the first episode SPOILER The Deep rapes the new superhero joining the team. and its found out hes done this countless times. so the show shits on him hard the rest of the way

          • Gnome Kat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            The part I am criticizing is all the depictions of animal abuse surrounding the deep, mostly not being committed by him but characters around him. Like the show sorta plays it as a joke or something. Like he deserves to see all these fish that as far as he is concerned are thinking sentient people be abused around him because he is a rapist. And in later season he himself is raped. It’s unclear what we are suppose to take away from his story line, is the animal abuse only he seems to care about suppose to be ok because he is a rapist? Or are we supposed to sympathize with him? the fish? It’s just a bit of a mess.

            I just think that aspect of the show could have been done better… the deep in general is kinda one of the worst characters in the show imo, by s3 his story line barely even intersects the main plot.

    • @argarath
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      I’m going to hope it’s about wanting to kill ourselves all the time, because if it becomes taboo I hope it’s because we have actually managed to make life better and thus suicide rates drop, but I honestly don’t know if we will get any better tbh

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        “There are no taboos against taking one’s life here,’ said the Night Haunter. ‘Many do. This is not a happy world. But it can be a better one. By killing yourself, you take the easy way out, you encourage others to do the same. You might think you add yourself to a statistic, but your self-murder is much more than that. Every suicide adds to the rot weakening your culture. Every life abandoned is a signal that change can never be effected. You throw your existence away, and in doing so lessen the value of humanity.”

        Proceeds to de-skin suicidal woman slowly.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Heh, as someone who deals with suicidal ideation daily, our collective devaluation of humanity drives my disgust. While our planet burns, human civilizations embrace imminent extinction (and the irrelevance of all current culture) to preserve the current power hierarchy.

          Nothing we do today will matter including those efforts to reduce the effects of a looming cataclysm and population correction until we collectively achieve a high threshold that significantly reduces its effects. Nothing in this case includes both my choice to kill myself and my choice to live another day.

          This time doesn’t matter until a huge number of us decide to collectively make it matter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      You should be safe if you don’t make fun of others. It’s not necessary to ridicule a specific person or group to make a joke.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Go in the future long enough and jokes about cis white males are gonna look really hurtful. Trying to attack Patriarchy and hitting the individual instead.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        That’s what I have a hard time with. Antivaxxers? Trump supporters? Callous billionaires? They all seem like fair game to me.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Antivaxxers? Trump supporters? Callous billionaires?

          Science deniers and right wingers has never been on the right side of the history, so these you mentioned will be remembered as the idiots they are, and Billionaires will continue to exist but will be remembered but not in the Star Trek name dropping Elon Musk kind of way, but in the way we remember other idiotic and callous billionares from a century ago.

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          In the case of previous groups, it’s usually persecuted and marginalized groups. So I don’t think that fits.

          I’m already seeing terms like “stupid”, “dumb”, “crazy” and other terms to refer to conditions people didn’t choose, especially mental ones, being used less and frowned upon occasionally. So maybe “crazy/insane” if we actually recognize it wildly as an issue or treat it.

          Online? I’m seeing a lot more hate and memes against furries cropping up that I hope goes away. Not that that’s new, but I think it’s shifting towards them since it’s become unacceptable in most circles to denigrate sexual and gender identities.

          Otherwise I think the question is: Who is society denigrating that is both a marginalized group and not actively/actually harmful?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Furries is a good one. There’s definitely a lot of hate. “My coworker’s daughter said they were talking about putting litter boxes in the classrooms!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Something that is right now still in the closet.

      I’ve only got skeletons and a broom in mine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Well then I’ve got a bonne to pick with you. And don’t try to sweep it all under the rug!

    • Troy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Going to throw this out there: self identification as a member of racial/ethnic/cultural group will become a hot button. Right now the left screams “cultural appropriation!” when this happens. But appropriating another gender is somehow okay. There’s a real mismatch here in logic, and at some point in the future this will flip. Like, currently it’s okay for me to say “I identify as a woman” but not “I identify as a black woman”. How does that even make sense?

      • wizzwizz4
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I think that’s mostly an American thing: they think that their “racial” categories are the same thing as ethnicity, and since race is defined by racists (who believe that it’s an innate inherited trait), it’s constrained by them too.

        “I was born French, but now I consider myself Corsican.” is an uncommon but perfectly normal thing in Europe.

        American racism is just absurd, even by racism standards. That absurdity even influences American anti-racism.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Good question. Men and women generally have radically different traditional roles, limitations, stereotypes, and expectations. The same can be said of white people and Black people. So, why is it okay to identify as one but not the other?

        Most questions I see involving identity aren’t asked in good faith, but this is an interesting one. Granted, it’s probably been addressed repeatedly, but I haven’t come across it before.