• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5511 months ago

    I love an opportunity to bag on ‘centrism’. It is often used as a cover for political ignorance. After all, would a non-illiterate claim both sides are the same? It only takes a few minutes to find some of the million ways they are not the same.

    • @shneancy
      link
      3411 months ago

      I once talked with an enlightened “pacifistic” centrist.

      At some point I used the low hanging fruit - colonialism! do you think both sides were right? I felt kind of silly for not using a more sophisticated argument but- he said “yes, they should’ve just talked and came to some compromise :)”. It didn’t matter to him that one side was clearly an aggressor, because since the native people tried defending themselves that was enough for him to think both sides were bad.

      clearly that fruit was a bit too high still, so I went with the good old - what about Jews and hitler? he replied that still, they should’ve tried to come to some sort of compromise- at that point I was very done talking to that guy. How on earth did he see a possible middle ground between “i’d like to live please thanks” and “i want your whole ethnicity eradicated” is beyond me

      the lesson is - start with arguments you find simple and straightforward, ones with obvious answers, because some people can and will trip over even the lowest hurdles, and it’ll save you a lot of time lol

        • @BURN
          link
          711 months ago

          The Thanos method

          • @samus12345
            link
            English
            1011 months ago

            “I can alter reality, and there aren’t enough resources to go around. Should I make people requires less resources to survive? Make the resources more plentiful? Naw, imma kill 50% of everybody. I’m so smart!”

        • @RGB3x3
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          The playground metaphor is a great one. And I love this quote:

          Paolo Freire said, “Washing one’s hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.”

          It’s not enough to remain neutral in a conflict, be it racism, fascism, colonialism, or otherwise. You have to be actively against it to hold a decent opinion, otherwise you’re assisting the racists, fascists, and colonizers.

      • @Mchugho
        link
        -7
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • @grue
      link
      English
      20
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Some people claim “both sides are the same” because they’re politically ignorant.

      Other people claim “both sides are the same” because they’re so far left that the distance between the right-wing party and the ultra-right-wing party is insignificant when it comes to the issues they care about. (Note: the ultra-right-wing party has been doing its damnedest to create distance by sprinting even further right, but at least until the recent fascism my argument was pretty valid.)

    • @RedditWanderer
      link
      811 months ago

      You can be on the fence about anything, but remember the devil owns the fence.

      • @Zehzin
        link
        811 months ago

        Now you listen here, bucko. The devil didn’t do all that work for you to associate him with centrists.

    • cannache
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Some things are the same and some things are different never ashamed to be blunt about it