…yeah, I’m sure Trump will have your back…

  • @Wodge
    link
    English
    317 months ago

    In a 2 party system, not voting for a party that does not rely on voter suppression, is giving a vote to a party that does.

    Conservatism needs disenfranchised votes, they always benefit from lower voter turn out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -117 months ago

      No, a +1 for Candidate A and a -1 for Candidate B is a swing of 2. A -1 for Candidate B is a swing of 1. 1 =/= 2.

      • @Wodge
        link
        English
        177 months ago

        Mathematically yes, you are correct. Politically, no. Conservatism needs low voter turnout to win. More voters = Higher likelihood of a more centrist/progressive victory. There is a reason conservative governments all over the planet are pushing for disenfranchising voters.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -87 months ago

          Disenfranchising disproportionately affecting one party over another is not the same as “Not voting for X is a vote for Y.”

          Were that actually true, Trump would have easily won the 2020 election with 154 million votes, since we’re counting the 80 million nonvoters as votes for him.

          • @Wodge
            link
            English
            87 months ago

            Disenfranchising reduces the total number of votes required to get a majority, so not voting for Biden helps whatever republican he ends up going against. Remember how McCarthy only got in the house speakership because Gaetz marked himself as present instead of voting for him? It’s the same thing.

              • @Wodge
                link
                English
                47 months ago

                No, but Biden could’ve had an extra 80 million votes were it not for a lot of people being unable to vote.

                  • @Wodge
                    link
                    English
                    07 months ago

                    Who knows?