…yeah, I’m sure Trump will have your back…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -111 year ago

    No, a +1 for Candidate A and a -1 for Candidate B is a swing of 2. A -1 for Candidate B is a swing of 1. 1 =/= 2.

    • @Wodge
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      Mathematically yes, you are correct. Politically, no. Conservatism needs low voter turnout to win. More voters = Higher likelihood of a more centrist/progressive victory. There is a reason conservative governments all over the planet are pushing for disenfranchising voters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -81 year ago

        Disenfranchising disproportionately affecting one party over another is not the same as “Not voting for X is a vote for Y.”

        Were that actually true, Trump would have easily won the 2020 election with 154 million votes, since we’re counting the 80 million nonvoters as votes for him.

        • @Wodge
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          Disenfranchising reduces the total number of votes required to get a majority, so not voting for Biden helps whatever republican he ends up going against. Remember how McCarthy only got in the house speakership because Gaetz marked himself as present instead of voting for him? It’s the same thing.

            • @Wodge
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              No, but Biden could’ve had an extra 80 million votes were it not for a lot of people being unable to vote.