As the title says, I’m interested in this community’s perceptions on nuclear energy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I agree that, in future, we will probably have ways to store and use energy from radioactive waste and I geological storage might probably be solution.

    But… we are still not close to it, “we will solve it in the future” is what got us here.

    Additionally, I just think there is no need to take such risks when there are other, safer options.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        If you take a look at “Status” column, only four of them are in use. After 60 years of nuclear energy and 440 nuclear power plants in 32 countries.

        I call that a big fail, and exact problem I am talking about.

        We don’t even need to go into question wether thise will be safe for thousands of years, which is doubtful.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          If I show you definite proof of extraterrestrial visits on Earth, it will not matter that 99.9999% of UFO sightings were fake.

          I call that a big fail, and exact problem I am talking about.

          No, you never specified the hypothetical blocking problems you are talking about. Existence of even one site in operation proves that no blocking problems exist.

          We don’t even need to go into question whether these will be safe for thousands of years, which is doubtful.

          My good man, these are designed for millions of years. Based on the observation of billions years old natural occurring isotopes. From the WP article:

          Despite a long-standing agreement among many experts that geological disposal can be safe, technologically feasible and environmentally sound, a large part of the general public in many countries remains skeptical as result of anti-nuclear campaigns.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Well I am sceptical. Maybe I can believe that US and other rich nations can make it work, I have huge doubts in most of the couries being careful enough.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Storage facility ahould not be “run”, it is not possible to guarantee someone will keep an eye on it for thousands of years.

                But you are right, running power plant is harder and I don’t trust most of the governments around the world to do it safety.

                If rich/stable countries focus only on nuclear as clean energy - risky countries will do the same or go to coal.

                We are not searching for solution only for US and Europe since it is not enough.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  It needs to be “run” as long as wastes keep coming in, then they are design to last for geological times with no human intervention.

                  Nuclear power killed less people than dams. If you trust a country with dams, nuclear power is a step up in terms of safety. And if US and China switched to nuclear, we already would be a long way on our path to solving the climate crisis.