• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -331 year ago

    It’s an article with listed facts, graphs, and data you fucking dullard, just read the damn article.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 year ago

      It says “Commentary” right on top. That means it is a comment and not an analysis. So maybe just read the damn commentary, before starting to insult people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -211 year ago

        Wtf difference does thst make?! Do you think the facts and sources are nullified since it’s labeled a commentary?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          The facts are basicly everything that happend in the past, as that can be measured. Everything about the future is just a comment from the author. It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.

          So if you actually care for the facts, it is that since Germany stopped its nuclear power plants Germany is producing less fossil fuel electricity. That graph comes straight from the Reuters piece. The question is if it continues that way and that is still open.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -81 year ago

            And the Reuters article says it most likely won’t and will be substituted with fossil fuel! And by going by that argumentation, I’m surprised you’re not suggesting climate change is just speculation since it’s all based on models and predictions

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              Again, can you read?

              It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.