@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agolinguisticsmander.xyzimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1627arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1620arrow-down1imagelinguisticsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@FeathercrowncakelinkEnglish15•8 months agoTo me, if you partially fall into a hole, ie. foot falls into a small pothole, you’ve fallen in it but not down it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•8 months agoIf I’m walking around in a hole and stumble, I’ve also fallen in a hole (but not into/down)
minus-square@FeathercrowncakelinkEnglish3•8 months agoYes, although I think that’s parsed differently-- you’ve [fallen] [in a hole] not [fallen in] [a hole]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•8 months agoYeah. I feel like fell down implies you travelled some not insignifcant distance while falling.
To me, if you partially fall into a hole, ie. foot falls into a small pothole, you’ve fallen in it but not down it.
If I’m walking around in a hole and stumble, I’ve also fallen in a hole (but not into/down)
Yes, although I think that’s parsed differently-- you’ve [fallen] [in a hole] not [fallen in] [a hole]
Yeah. I feel like fell down implies you travelled some not insignifcant distance while falling.