• KSP Atlas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    Fell down a hole implies that the hole is vertical and going downwards

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      In that case, does “I fell in a hole” imply that the hole is horizontal and going sideways?

      • bach37strad
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        That’s how my best friend accidently got my girlfriend pregnant.

        Tie your damn shoelaces people!

  • @quaddo
    link
    English
    161 year ago

    See also “fell into a hole”.

  • @Feathercrown
    link
    English
    151 year ago

    To me, if you partially fall into a hole, ie. foot falls into a small pothole, you’ve fallen in it but not down it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      If I’m walking around in a hole and stumble, I’ve also fallen in a hole (but not into/down)

      • @Feathercrown
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Yes, although I think that’s parsed differently-- you’ve [fallen] [in a hole] not [fallen in] [a hole]

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Yeah. I feel like fell down implies you travelled some not insignifcant distance while falling.

  • rhythmisaprancer
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Well this changes that Alice In Chains song for me 🕳️

    But this is something that makes English both frustrating and fascinating!

    • @Frozengyro
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      All language is like this. It’s a large part of why communication is actually very difficult.

      • rhythmisaprancer
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        This is awesome. I only know some of one other language but am not as fluent in it. This is good to know, thanks!

  • @MadPlaid
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Out of curiosity, shouldn’t there be a comma after the “or” in the third panel?

    • radix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Grammatically, no, because “or” is a coordinating conjunction (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so), and coordinating conjunctions are a way to join two independent clauses, like a semicolon. They are used after an independent clause and a comma, and they are followed by another coordinating conjunction.

      Here’s two independent clauses: I got scratched by a cat. I’m sad.

      Here’s a way to join them with a semicolon: I got scratched by a cat; I’m sad. The semicolon replaces the period.

      Here’s a way to join them with a coordinating conjunction: I got scratched by a cat, so I’m sad. The , so replaces the semicolon/period.

      Note that I got scratched by a cat so, I’m sad is incorrect, because to join two independent clauses, you’re supposed to put the comma first and then the conjunction, in that order. Colloquially, people will often omit the comma entirely, to reflect pronunciation I guess. But as far as I can tell, people don’t generally pronounce a pause between the coordinating conjunction and the following independent clause, so they don’t put a comma there either.

      • @MadPlaid
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I really appreciate this comment and enjoy that I learned something today.

        • radix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I’m so glad it didn’t come off as passive-aggressive or rude. Thank you for this message. I hope you have a truly wonderful day, my friend.

    • @HonoraryMancunian
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      No I don’t think it’s necessary at all, unless the author wanted to emphasise a pause there