China has accused Canada of carrying out “malicious and provocative” actions in the South China Sea, after the Canadian Navy said Chinese fighter jets endangered a helicopter in two close intercepts above international waters.

The comments come after CNN revealed last week that a Chinese warplane fired flares in front of a Canadian military helicopter on October 29, an operation that Canadian military officers said was reckless and could have resulted in the downing of the aircraft.

The incident was the second of two “unsafe” encounters the Canadian chopper had on that day with Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy J-11 fighters, which got as close as 100 feet (30 meters) from the helicopter, Maj. Rob Millen, air officer aboard the Royal Canadian Navy frigate HMCS Ottawa, told CNN in an interview on the warship.

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -181 year ago

    I kinda hope they do and the US decides it’s had enough and declares war and launches the fleets to force Xi to apologise or get him ousted by the rest of the party. Obviously don’t want a real war, just real looking enough to freak out the CCP into backing down.

    • Pennomi
      link
      English
      531 year ago

      The outcome of that would more likely be war than a restructure of Chinese government.

      And such a war would certainly make WWII look like babies at play.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Almost seems like china wants it. Their pilots are trained, their pilots act like infants… its a safe bet they’re trained to act like infants.

          • @AnUnusualRelic
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Major Cracks Spotted On Chinese Aircraft Carrier Fujian

            I’ll have you know that Major Cracks is a highly decorated member of the PLA!

            (PLN maybe?)

          • @Sunrosa
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Does anyone understand the impacts of this (genuine question)? I doubt the crack actually goes very deep, and is probably just in the deck armor. But that’s probably very expensive to replace. I assume the point here is that it’s ridiculous their carriers are cracking on their own while in active service, probably due to negligence.

            Also, is it possible that’s just water or dirt? Or are we sure that’s a crack?

            • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              it’s ridiculous their carriers are cracking

              That’s the point, I have no idea of the full impacts, I am not a crack expert. Well, not in these kinds of cracks at least.

              Considering how bad modern Chinese construction can be, it wouldn’t be surprising if the whole thing just snapped in half.

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            English
            -411 year ago

            It’s their playground. We’re on their playground. Imagine if China had bases in Cuba and Bermuda and were flying near our airspace. Geez, the liberal brain rot is real.

              • @Sunrosa
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                This is fucked up! Planes crash at lower altitudes from wake turbulence from much farther away, and that’s from being behind passenger jets! Not only do they crash, but they sometimes rip planes apart where they stand! This is an act not just of warning/bullying but of blatant aggression.

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                English
                -261 year ago

                It’s the best excuse. If China was flying off the coast of South Carolina you don’t think our military would do that? GTFOH

                • Piecemakers
                  link
                  English
                  61 year ago

                  Dammit, gramps. You’re standing in your own liquid shit again.

                  • @TokenBoomer
                    link
                    English
                    -21 year ago

                    Attack the person instead of the argument. Nice.

                • @T00l_shed
                  link
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  In international waters? Sure maybe they would fly close to keep an eye, but they wouldn’t buzz helicopters or fly dangerously close to other air craft. Your brain rot is real.

                  • @TokenBoomer
                    link
                    English
                    -4
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Sure. I give links with evidence. You insult me. And I have brain rot?

                • @Sunrosa
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  The south china sea is bordered by many nations. It does not belong to china.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              It’s not “their playground”. Besides the fact that the South China Sea is a crucial international trade route (and thus shouldn’t “belong” to anyone), it is also bordered by many nations other than China, like Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines. And these nations are very bothered by the way China is using its size to bully them out of their own coastline. That is why Canada is there, to prevent China from dominating the smaller states. Obviously NATO has more than one goal in the region, but they are not uninvited guests and, in a world as globalized as ours, the South China Sea might as well be Canada’s playground.

              • @Sunrosa
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                The united states navy is also working in the south china sea for the same reason iirc

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                English
                -11 year ago

                Might makes right? That’s a very liberal interpretation.

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                I’m not a tankie, I could just be an old man with a warped world view.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        We need to figure out ways to reorient China’s ambitions from an impossible ask - Taiwan, the 9-dash-line, and the South China Sea, and point out the obvious low hanging fruit, that wouldn’t require force projection / airborne and naval landings, and a world class navy to oppose literally every other country in the pacific, and invest those resources where they could gain massive ground, repatriate ethnic chinese and repatriate Chinese cities that they were forced to give up and still want back, like Vladivostok. Russia is sick. China is already pushing for greater influence in the -stan countries - the move only requires a will for China to head north, capturing enormous amounts of land, resources and new citizens / customers for it’s industries. And unlike the Pacific, I don’t know that many will want to save them after the last few years… I don’t see Belarus scrambling resources to send to defend Irkutsk.

        • @Nudding
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          What about America’s blood/oil lust?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            oh don’t worry buddy I’m sure we’ll still find some assholes or innocents to bomb, we’re industrious like that, whole network of spy sattelites up there just peekin’ and peeping for someone doing something fuckity that disagrees with our freedumbs.

            never fails bud.