• @Madison420
    link
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes

    behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Do you propose, then, that everyone should be allowed to do as they please with absolutely zero rules?

      • @Madison420
        link
        11 year ago

        Point to where I added my opinion.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Forgive me for assuming you considered violence to be bad.

          Since we’ve presupposed that all authority must in some way stem from the threat of violence, a hatred for violence cannot exist without a hatred for authority.

          • @Madison420
            link
            11 year ago

            I ask again, point to where I added my opinion on the matter.

            What exactly is your point.

              • @Madison420
                link
                11 year ago

                You have not quoted me once, you’ve projected your feelings into my statements and yet cannot explain which one you’re deriving your flawed opinion of me from.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This thread started because you asked someone to name a single nonviolent revolution. Such a thing cannot possibly exist, especially considering your inexplicably broad definition of that word.

              You cannot seriously equate shooting someone with taking a child’s dessert away, simply because you consider them both to be violence. Considering this I’m a bit confused as to your point.

              • @Madison420
                link
                11 year ago

                That was my point.

                Point to where I ever said or implied such a thing, please you don’t actually have a point without a quote you can reference.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So you aren’t presenting an opinion and your intent with this discussion was just to stir the pot for no reason.

                  Good to know I’m talking to a troll. Have a nice life.

                  • @Madison420
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    I provided a statement of fact, if that’s stirring the pot to you then consider it stirred.

                    Not at all, I’ve responded in good faith, why you’re upset is beyond me.