• N-E-N
    link
    fedilink
    331 year ago

    A lot of things don’t support it yet, but it’s technically a better compression format

    • @Ottomateeverything
      link
      191 year ago

      This is how every new thing starts though. You don’t just get better standards overnight. Jpg and png didn’t happen overnight either. PNG had this problem for quite a while.

      It’s not a problem with WebP. It’s a problem with tooling that aren’t moving forwards to objectively more effective formats.

        • @Ottomateeverything
          link
          11 year ago

          It came out in the past 15 years. Most “common” formats like png and jpg came out in the 90s. Others like tif, bmp, and gif are from the 80s.

          So yeah, it is “new”, it’s just very relative.

      • N-E-N
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Yea I have nothing against WebP myself. I also wish HEIC was more widely supported

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          HEIC now has a licensing cost to it, meaning devs have to pay to make their software able to open it. Microsoft recently removed HEIC support from their software because of it.

    • ares35
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      better compression that’s often configured wrong by site admins and the quality is shit-tier.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        Nope. JPEG XL is more modern and delivers lower file sizes without fucking up image quality as much. Downside is that, right now, JPEG XL is actually supported by even less things, because it is still so new.

        But it is an industry standard rather than just Google trying to push its own thing, so I do expect it to overtake WebP in a few years.