• @xkforce
    link
    English
    231 year ago

    Rankine is there twice.

    • @meco03211
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      And it shouldn’t have degrees like Kelvin, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        251 year ago

        The Rankine scale is generally measured in degrees. That’s because it’s defined in terms of the Fahrenheit scale, which is also measured in degrees. i.e. 1 Rankine degree = 1 Fahrenheit degree.

        This is not the case for the Kelvin scale, which is defined directly in terms of thermal energy: 1 Kelvin ≈ 1.38*10^-23 J. Coincidentally (but not really of course) this amount of thermal energy is such that an increase of 1 Kelvin corresponds to 1 degree Celsius.

        This is rather pedantic, as you could easily define Rankine in terms of thermal energy as well. Some people do this and don’t say “degrees” in front of Rankine. Or, you could define the Kelvin in terms of the Celsius, and measure it in degrees.

        tl:dr Rankine has degrees, but for mainly historical reasons.

        P.S.: Kelvin actually also had degrees until 1968!

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        It does share a 0 with kelvin

        And F and C share a -44

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Not if it’s an absolute scale, no. And then it does actually agree on what 0 is with Kelvin too.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Someone probably incorrectly wrote Réaumur degrees. (Copy of Celsius but ×0.8 for some reason; somehow stays kinda relevant in 1770-1920 Europe)

    • linuxgator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      °R refers to the Réaumur temperature scale which goes from 0 for freezing and 80 is the boiling point.

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      And had the same zero as Kelvin.