• @meco03211
    cake
    link
    English
    128 months ago

    And it shouldn’t have degrees like Kelvin, right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      258 months ago

      The Rankine scale is generally measured in degrees. That’s because it’s defined in terms of the Fahrenheit scale, which is also measured in degrees. i.e. 1 Rankine degree = 1 Fahrenheit degree.

      This is not the case for the Kelvin scale, which is defined directly in terms of thermal energy: 1 Kelvin ≈ 1.38*10^-23 J. Coincidentally (but not really of course) this amount of thermal energy is such that an increase of 1 Kelvin corresponds to 1 degree Celsius.

      This is rather pedantic, as you could easily define Rankine in terms of thermal energy as well. Some people do this and don’t say “degrees” in front of Rankine. Or, you could define the Kelvin in terms of the Celsius, and measure it in degrees.

      tl:dr Rankine has degrees, but for mainly historical reasons.

      P.S.: Kelvin actually also had degrees until 1968!

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      English
      78 months ago

      It does share a 0 with kelvin

      And F and C share a -44

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            Maybe they got the 4 part mixed up from the old chem rhyme:

            Johnny was a chemist, but Johnny is no more, because what he thought was H2O was H2SO4

      • @meco03211
        cake
        link
        English
        38 months ago

        It’s actually -40. Not 44.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      Not if it’s an absolute scale, no. And then it does actually agree on what 0 is with Kelvin too.