• @FooBarrington
    link
    English
    271 year ago

    Because Toyota invested a lot into hydrogen instead of EV, and they need to recuperate at least some of it.

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Honestly I’m glad that somebody is exploring other environmentally friendly alternatives too, nothing wrong with having options.

      • @FooBarrington
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Kind of? Hydrogen can be environmentally friendly, but EVs have big advantages:

        • Creating and burning hydrogen is way less efficient than EVs (almost an order of magnitude)
        • Hydrogen is much cheaper to create in environmentally unfriendly ways (using natural gas etc.)
        • Unless we have massive overproduction of power, the additional energy can be better used to de-carbonify other processes with larger impact
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          That’s why generating hydrogen during off-peak hours from a nuclear power plant will be very beneficial. It may be less efficient but way better for the environment then lithium

          • @FooBarrington
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            You still have all the transport and storage costs associated with hydrogen. I’d need to see a study that actually determines the environmental impact of lithium to believe you.

    • @Geobloke
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      They’ve invested heavily into a partnership with Panasonic to build solid state batteries too . They hand just spread their risk