• @Maalus
    link
    -181 year ago

    “Being a villian” lmao. It totally wasn’t the guy who trashed the place, or the government for stupid laws. It was the guy renting out the apartment. Because as we all know, the alternative is that the guy would give the apartment to you for free instead of renting, right? With no strings attached, everybody would get a house if only landlords weren’t villians!

    • @LemmyKnowsBest
      link
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Give it away? No I suggested he SELL it to escape from all the corruption. Wipe his hands clean of everything.

        • @MuThyme
          link
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -81 year ago

            They will buy it, live in it, and another unit of housing stock is now unavailable. That will reduce general availability, and push up prices. If that tenant wasn’t such a self centred, selfish asshole, the owner would have kept renting it at a loss, and availability would still be there. This is a two sided story, and many landlords are in the same situation. They are not all these insane, evil, wealthy monsters the internet makes them out to be.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              This isn’t a problem if the person that buys the property lives in it.

              You are just being dense on purpose to give a bad faith argument.

        • @LemmyKnowsBest
          link
          71 year ago

          Because the person who lives in the home would be the person who owns the home, thereby ending the cycle of landlord woes.

      • @Maalus
        link
        -131 year ago

        Sell it, let their money be eaten by inflation in two years. Just because a rando on the internet calls them evil for renting out a house, because they themselves hate their landlord.