Lawmakers could vote for infrastructure bill, then buy stock in a concrete firm.

  • 520
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Problem is, we don’t get any forewarning about how they’re gonna vote.

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      -8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The example was about someone who votes for an infrastructure bill and then buys a stock. Votes are public, so you could buy the stock at the same time they do.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        The problem there is that automated traders have the same idea - and are a shit ton faster than you. So by the time you’ve so much as heard of it, the price is already up 25%

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          -91 year ago

          Maybe, but then legislators would have the same problem buying that stock.

          • 520
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No they don’t. They can buy the stock before the vote, knowing which way the vote is gonna go.

            Senators do communicate with each other on these things, even exchange votes (eg: I’ll vote for this if you vote for that). That’s before we get into the matter of party whips pressing members to vote certain ways. None of that is public record.

            • TWeaK
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              They can buy the stock before the vote, knowing which way the vote is gonna go.

              Well that would seemingly be against the “STOCK” act. I’m sure the SEC would have something to say about that…

              lol :(

            • @FlowVoid
              link
              English
              -71 year ago

              The example was someone who bought after voting. So at least that doesn’t seem to present a problem.

              If someone knows a bill is coming up that is likely to pass, they too can buy the stock before the vote.

              If nobody knows whether it will pass besides the legislator, then yeah that’s totally insider trading. Which is already illegal.

              But frankly that’s a pretty rare situation. Legislators usually telegraph well in advance how they are going to vote for upcoming bills. And when the outcome is a surprise, it usually surprises the legislators too.

              • 520
                link
                fedilink
                6
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If nobody knows whether it will pass besides the legislator, then yeah that’s totally insider trading. Which is already illegal.

                Correct. The problem is that it’s not enforced on senator’s as they don’t want to indict their fellow congressperson

                • @FlowVoid
                  link
                  English
                  -51 year ago

                  Sure, but if that’s true then banning it with another law won’t change anything.

                  • 520
                    link
                    fedilink
                    4
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Correct. It’s the enforcement of the law that needs to change.

                    Specifically, enforcement needs to be automated, rather than relying on someone in the political game manually pulling the trigger. Because that someone at the moment has every politics reason not to, thus enforcement is the exception and not the norm

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  The article says it is illegal for them to trade on nonpublic information. Isn’t that the definition of insider trading?

                  In 2012, President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act, banning members of Congress from trading with nonpublic information, meaning details they glean in their work that are not available to the general public.

                  Not saying it doesn’t still happen, but it is illegal.

                • @FlowVoid
                  link
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  Insider trading is absolutely illegal for legislators. In fact, Chris Collins (NY-27) is currently serving time for insider trading.