@Clbull to [email protected] • 1 year agoWeight loss ruleimagemessage-square24arrow-up1837arrow-down18
arrow-up1829arrow-down1imageWeight loss rule@Clbull to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square24
minus-squareOctopuslinkfedilink4•1 year agoI still haven’t seen any joke about FAT or ExFAT (extra fat), but I really want to.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•1 year agoYo mamas so exFAT, the last time she crashed she formed the Grand Canyon. Yo mamas filesystem is so FAT I couldn’t install Call of Duty on it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoSir or madam, exfat is definitely ‘no longer fat’, and I will die on this hill.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year agoFirstly, it’s a newer format, better, gooder - one could even say sleeker? Two, it allows (by way of support) larger capacity on the same media, which would be an equivalent to lower volume and higher strength, akin to the body of a weightlifter.
I still haven’t seen any joke about FAT or ExFAT (extra fat), but I really want to.
Yo mamas so exFAT, the last time she crashed she formed the Grand Canyon.
Yo mamas filesystem is so FAT I couldn’t install Call of Duty on it.
Yo mama so FAT I needed to RAID her
Sir or madam, exfat is definitely ‘no longer fat’, and I will die on this hill.
Firstly, it’s a newer format, better, gooder - one could even say sleeker?
Two, it allows (by way of support) larger capacity on the same media, which would be an equivalent to lower volume and higher strength, akin to the body of a weightlifter.