• SirStumps
    link
    English
    110 months ago

    Explain! Explain!

    • @LemmyIsFantastic
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      We’re going to spend a half million dollars investigating who cut someone’s hair.

      It was likely an accident in an over worked hospital but now we’re going to make sure we make this political.

      • 7heo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Plus, hair is a known source of infections. It is routine to shave hairs in hospitals, as a preventive measure.

        This isn’t anything new either, the shaolin monks (among others) notoriously shave to prevent infections in open wounds and cuts.

        It’s sad for the person’s hair, as apparently it was a big part of their identity, but if it comes down to receiving care or keeping the hair, a choice has been made. It’s a bit disingenuous to complain about the way you were saved, after being saved…

        • Jaytreeman
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          If this was a Sikh man the hair likely would have remained because religious reasons. The moment the guy’s indigenous and they no longer care about those same reasons

          • 7heo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Yeah in this case that’s just wrong. Medicine is science, and science is independent of religion. So that really shouldn’t be the case…

      • SirStumps
        link
        English
        110 months ago

        Well explained!

        Yeah that is dumb.