• @xkforce
    link
    251 year ago

    This seems like a pretty dumb thing to do to try to wipe out a browser with 2% marketshare.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      601 year ago

      “I’m switching from Chrome because they killed ad blocking.”

      “OMG! Firefox takes 5 seconds to even load webpages! I’ll just go back to Chrome.”

      The goal is to prevent the competition from growing.

        • @what_is_a_name
          link
          51 year ago

          Do not worry Vestager lives for shit like this. She’ll make them bend over, take it deep, and pay her for her pleasure.

    • @Cornelius_Wangenheim
      link
      351 year ago

      It won’t stay at 2% if it’s the only browser with a working adblocker.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Obviously there a people in charge now who will never understand the Streisand effect. They could have kept it quiet and just… allow… the technical adept users to do their thing. Now, they are the laughing stock and get unwanted attention. Also, from my layman understanding, this shit won’t fly in the EU at all.

      Or, to say it differently: This is the best thing to happen to Mozilla in quite a long time and I’m a fan.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        I’m out of the loop. What happened? Did someone decompile their code and find definitive proof of a throttle for Firefox?

          • @Wild_Mastic
            link
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Users who have ad blockers installed may experience suboptimal viewing

            Yeah let me turn off the adblocker just for having an even more suboptimal viewing due to ads. They’re lunatics.

          • Thorned_Rose
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Thanks for the explainer! Also, Google’s response is such a crock of shit.

        • @Synthead
          link
          English
          181 year ago

          JavaScript is an interpreted language, so no decompilation is necessary, although this is repeatable by using a Firefox user agent.

          • Kogasa
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            You can build a virtual machine in JavaScript and execute compiled code on it

              • Kogasa
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Oh yeah, you shouldn’t. But people do this for fingerprinting, bot detection, and other “adversarial” scenarios where you really don’t like the person executing your code. It’s somewhat plausible Google would use this technique to do something scummy like this (although that is not the case).

                Relevant article and a great read: https://www.nullpt.rs/reverse-engineering-tiktok-vm-1

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
      link
      11 year ago

      I’m guessing that it’s a way for them to test if ads have been loaded after initial scripts have run, but I’m not going to dig into the code.

      Honestly, the whole ads thing is missing the point. If you desired a public video hosting platform, that needs to be a tax-funded commons. Video hosting and streaming is very expensive. Similarly, users should be donating to keep Lemmy going:

      https://opencollective.com/mastodonworld

      https://patreon.com/mastodonworld