kingthrillgore to [email protected] • 1 year agodoes this code run rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1281arrow-down13
arrow-up1278arrow-down1imagedoes this code run rulelemmy.mlkingthrillgore to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-square[email protected]linkfedilink59•1 year agoI mean this would remove False and None from a list though.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish31•1 year agoAnd empty lists, tuples, dictionaries, sets, and strings
minus-squareLostXORlinkfedilink4•1 year agoresults = [result for result in results if result != None]
minus-squareLostXORlinkfedilink2•1 year agoYou’re right, though IIRC there’s no functional difference when comparing to None (other than speed).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoYes there is. One invokes __ne__ on the left hand side, the other performs an identity comparison.
I mean this would remove False and None from a list though.
Also 0 and empty strings
And empty lists, tuples, dictionaries, sets, and strings
results = list(filter(None, results))results = [result for result in results if result != None]Should be
is not None(:You’re right, though IIRC there’s no functional difference when comparing to None (other than speed).
Yes there is. One invokes
__ne__on the left hand side, the other performs an identity comparison.