• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Indeed, Windows could easily stop mislabeling TiB as TB, but it seems it’s too hard for them.

    • @guy
      link
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The IEC changing the definition of 1KB from 1024 bytes to 1000 bytes was a terrible idea that’s given us this whole mess. Sure, it’s nice and consistent with scientific prefix now… except it’s far from consistent in actual usage. So many things still consider it binary prefix following the JEDEC standard. Like KiB that’s always 1024 bytes, I really think they should’ve introduced another new unambiguous unit eg. KoB that’s always 1000 bytes and deprecated the poorly defined KB altogether

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        M stands for Mega, a SI prefix that existed longer than the computer data that is being labeled. MB being 1000000 bytes was always the correct definition, it’s just that someone decided that they could somehow change it.

        • @guy
          link
          31 year ago

          Consistency with proper scientific prefix is nice to have, but consistency within the computing industry itself is really important, and now we have neither. In this industry, binary calculations were centric, and powers of 2 were much more useful. They really should’ve picked a different prefix to begin with, yes. However, for the IEC correcting it retroactively, this has failed. It’s a mess that’s far from actually standardised now

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          B and b have never been SI units. Closest is Bq. So if people had not been insisting that it’s confusing noone would’ve been confused.