No need to remove the URL tracking parameters manually. 🥳

Firefox copy link without site tracking

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍
      link
      fedilink
      1521 year ago

      Or a setting that makes it the default.

      I don’t like any software I use to destroy data (even tracking data) without my say so.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        471 year ago

        Hmm, I agree with you 100%, but power of defaults is how big companies get average consumers. Maybe Firefox should make it default with a setting to turn it on?

        A setting titled “allow copying of tracking data”, a lot of people won’t allow.

        Fight fire with fire.

        • @LufyCZ
          link
          -4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This just:

          1. Encourages companies to try to work around it

          2. More importantly, possibly breaks important functionality

          • @uis
            link
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s like saying GDPR encourages companies to try work around data protection, so it should not be implemented.

            • @LufyCZ
              link
              31 year ago

              It’s not like that at all.

              Links support parameters for a reason, and I promise you that the main reason isn’t tracking. They can convey important info like the language, search parameters, a specific comment, etc.

              Removing them willy-nilly by default is going to cause issue sooner or later, and then people are going to blame Firefox for “not working” and are just gonna switch to Chrome because “it just works”.

              That’s not what we want is it?

              • @uis
                link
                21 year ago

                As I understand now it removes only limited set of query strings

                • @LufyCZ
                  link
                  31 year ago

                  Yeah but the list is hardcoded. Collisions can happen.

                  Also, since it’s hardcoded, it’s easily gameable, and it will be gamed if too many people start filtering them out.

                  It’s a good start but a bad solution overall

                  • @uis
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    “utm_” collisions?

      • @theo
        link
        61 year ago

        If you wanted to do this and make it default, I believe you should be able to do so using userChrome.css. You won’t be able to change the text, but you can remove the old menu item.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m unlikely to use the menu button, I generally use Ctrl+C/Cmd+C. I’ll have to poke around and see if there’s an option to set that shortcut.

          • @theo
            link
            21 year ago

            Correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t think you would be able to do this as ctrl+c copies what is highlighted rather than the actual link.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I just want a shortcut for “copy without tracking” on the current tab instead of having to use the context menu. I’m fine with it not being “Ctrl+C,” as long as it’s reasonably easy to remember, like maybe “Ctrl+Shift+C” or even a sequence of commands (i.e. select address bar, then special copy command).

              Likewise, there should be an easy way to open a link without trackers, like “Ctrl+shift+click” or something.

    • HiramFromTheChiOP
      link
      English
      301 year ago

      Or at least the option to make it the default. I could see some situations where someone may want to test a link with non-identifying parameters (like identifying the campaign source), and not wanting to have that stripped from the URL by default.

      But I get you, from a consumer perspective I’d also want it as my default.

      In the meantime, there’s ClearURLs or uBlock Origin with filter lists.

    • Meldrik
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Doesn’t it just clean up the link or does Firefox actually know which part of the link to remove?

        • Meldrik
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          How does it know what part of the link is the site tracking?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Looks like it has a list of global and site specific parameters that it is safe to remove.

          • bitwolf
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Generally, most are variables prefixed with utm_

            They likely built an index from most of the Analytics services also.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I think it’s a combination of things, a basic approach of removing the query string (after the question mark) with exceptions for different sites that might need some of the query string.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      It’s not the default because it can break links sometimes, like links that have authentication details in the parameters.

    • bitwolf
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s an addon I use for the Android version that does this by default.

      It does miss some queryparams though but it dramatically reduces the URL size for the big offending sites.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      But default is putting your cursor in the address bar and hitting ctrl-c. How would Firefox clean it like that?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If it removes the tracking from the link before the page loads, it could work. So it would already be clean when you copy it.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        On android anyway, that’s an interceptable action, and you can also monitor and alter the clipboard.

        So they could either alter what gets copied before its copied, or scan the copied item after it’d copied and alter it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        It doesn’t.

        If you think about it though, you’ve already visited that link so why clean it now.