I’ve heard it explained that “hey” used to be more of an urgent way to get someone’s attention, rather than a casual “hello” like it is now, so it sounded rude to some older folks.

    • @xantoxis
      link
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      only one way to interpret “you’re welcome”

      This is just wrong. Tone matters just as much with “you’re welcome” as it does with “no problem”. Language is fluid like that, and it’s completely arbitrary to elevate one of these expressions over the other when both are in common usage.

      Also, you’re deliberately misrepresenting what “no problem” means, in regards to “that’s the only reason you complied”. Nobody says it that way, and I don’t believe that you think they do.

            • @schmidtster
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              I don’t give two flying fucks what the waiter says, bring me my food and don’t be an ass with your demeanor.

    • @schmidtster
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If someone says you’re welcome, you know they are a corporate drone and management wants them to say that to avoid certain people making a scene. Why’s it insincere to say no problem? In the same vein, they only said you’re welcome because they are complying too.

      There’s no issues with saying no problem unless you want there to be. Those are cool workplaces.

        • @schmidtster
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And so can you’re welcome. So why does it matter which phrase if both can be misconstrued?

          Language matters everywhere, who mentioned anything about an office building?

          And the only issue is you taking offense, there’s plenty of people who have no issues with no problem, but take offense from you’re welcome. Why is everything about you….?

            • @schmidtster
              link
              English
              51 year ago

              Both can be wrong, if you can’t understand that, you’re an idiot.

            • @mriormro
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              your problem

              No problem!

                • @mriormro
                  link
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  Quite frankly, I couldn’t give a flying fuck concerning your opinion on whether or not using the phrase ‘no problem’ within the context of hospitality services is correct or not. I was just making a silly joke

                  But judging by how everyone else is responding to you, I’m pretty confident in saying almost everyone here also couldn’t give a flying fuck about your opinion.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      English
      -41 year ago

      Maybe they should just die, that way they don’t have to face a world they clearly can’t deal with.

        • @magnusrufus
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          Callous and bigoted but you are hung up on if people say you’re welcome?

        • @afraid_of_zombies
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          You can tell a lot about a person by what unrelated ideas they introduce.

    • @scottywh
      link
      English
      -71 year ago

      The implication is that a problem was assumed until “no problem” was stated.

      “No problem” is absolutely low key rude.

      • @mriormro
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        To me, ‘No problem’ is just short for something like “oh don’t worry about it; it was really no problem at all and I’m happy to help”.

        Colloquialisms are fun like that.

          • @mriormro
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Midwest, actually!

        • @scottywh
          link
          English
          -81 year ago

          The context in which the listener is expected to comprehend communication is important if the speaker hopes for the intended message to actually be communicated.

          If the speaker chooses to ignore how the listener is expected to perceive their communication then I’d say that actual communication was never truly their intent… seems more like linguistic masturbation to me.