• @MsPenguinette
    link
    2867 months ago

    Cool. So what’s he gonna do about it? Or was this it?

    • @iBaz
      link
      1047 months ago

      What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

      • @WeeSheep
        link
        1547 months ago

        Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          347 months ago

          lets add taxing the shit out of people who do this to the list.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 months ago

          How would you like the President of the United States to do that? Do you think the President is a dictator that can just unilaterally pass sweeping legislation? How do you think the public would react if the President had the power to directly determine the prices of goods? How do you think that would go in general?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            67 months ago

            The fact this is even in the negatives a tiny bit really demonstrates the typical political intelligence of your average voter.

            You’re of course completely correct, and Biden has indeed done everything he LEGALLY can do, which is probably why we’re suffering far less than a lot of the rest of the developed world economically speaking.

            People just like to shout at the wind, it seems.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        207 months ago

        Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You’ll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

        Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can’t do that. It’s the consumers that are at fault!

        • @iBaz
          link
          137 months ago

          Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

          • @MsPenguinette
            link
            147 months ago

            He can propose laws to the legislative bramch. He might not be able to pass it himself but he could push and advocate for it

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -5
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Oh what does it hurt then?

                Can’t say anything, because of the GOP.

                Super cool having a democrat president who’s got no balls. Can’t offend the house.

                • prole
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  27 months ago

                  What does it hurt? Political capital, for one.

                  Also, you don’t just say, “let’s make a law about X”, and a 3,000 page bill just appears in front of you. That shit takes TONS of work. Biden can’t just materialize a workable plan that both parties (in this political climate? lol) will ever agree on.

                  That just isn’t how this country works. If you want this to change, Congress has to change it.

                  • @rambaroo
                    link
                    27 months ago

                    I love how “political capital” is the neolibs go-to excuse for why the working class can’t be helped. Yet there’s a never ending amount of “political capital” I help giant corporations make more money. Fucking tools

                • @SCB
                  link
                  07 months ago

                  This is a thread about him saying things.

      • @graymess
        link
        57 months ago

        Price controls are well within the president’s powers. It’s not that radical of a concept.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 months ago

          It’s within congress’s powers for sure. I don’t think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          77 months ago

          Why is this upvoted?

          No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

        • @SCB
          link
          -9
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Price controls are an extremely radical concept, themselves. Last thing this economy needs is further distortion.

          The sucky thing about inflation is you have to run through it like an illness.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Windfall taxes. Let them share their gains, that’s the whole point of taxes since society don’t work otherwise.

            • @SCB
              link
              37 months ago

              That’s vastly different from a direct price control, in both intent and effect.

              I’d love to pass lots more taxes but with the current House that’s completely impossible

        • @nutsack
          link
          97 months ago

          ok. but this is factually correct

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Do you know basic US Civics, or…? Biden has the bully pulpit (basically what he’s doing here), and that’s pretty much it. He can issue executive orders (and has in the past about this), but those are often complete bullshit that’s unenforceable, and will be removed by the next person in the office.

          Take a look at Trump rolling back Obama’s EPA purview over waterways in the US for a recent example that has left over 60% of our nation’s waterways now unprotected.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -97 months ago

            Biden is like dog shit on the bottom of FDR’s shoe. He is weak and pathetic and the only thing he cares about are his corporate donors

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              87 months ago

              Lol way to just talk past me. Did you even read the comment?

            • @assassin_aragorn
              link
              17 months ago

              FDR sicced Federal agencies on a leftist to discredit him.

              Oh the irony.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          Do you want a dictatorship or something? Congress writes laws, talk to your members of congress.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      that was basically it. short of siccing the irs on them there’s not a lot the executive branch can do about it… of course that’d kill the golden goose named “campaign contributions”, so it wont happen

      • @SCB
        link
        107 months ago

        siccing the IRS on them

        Nothing the IRS can do, either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          87 months ago

          Windfall taxes is a thing they can use. If companies raise their prices too fast the excess profit gets taxed at a higher rate.

          • @SCB
            link
            107 months ago

            Need the House for that tho.

      • @pahlimur
        link
        07 months ago

        No. Just stop with the disinformation.

    • @takeda
      link
      247 months ago

      It will be harder to pass new laws in the current Congress, but he still has control over the executive branch. Hopefully some existing laws could be used.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        He appointed the most aggressive FTC head in decades who is using the antitrust law we have to currently go after Google and Amazon.

        She’s also fighting a merger between Kroger and Albertsons, which would drastically raise grocery prices.

        The FTC is also fighting the hedge fund buyout of preciously independent healthcare clinics, which has massively ramped up medical costs.

        Not to mention breaking the real estate agent fee monopoly.

        His executive branch has been busy as hell trying to help people.

    • John Richard
      link
      157 months ago

      He’ll hire their execs to run various government agencies

    • @TheDubz87
      link
      -107 months ago

      I mean, you wouldn’t want the politicians to lose their legal bribes generous donations over acting in our interests instead of the corporations, would you?

      Will someone please think of the rich folks pockets?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here??? Or am I missing some other reason for the downvotes?

        FWIW, I thought your comment was great. Gave me quite a chuckle! :-D

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          Because this is just more of that “enlightened centrist both sides baaaaaaad” bullshit that dumbasses invoke whenever they want to diminish the power of one side, thus actually strengthening the other side, while claiming that they don’t care about sides at all, even though they just can’t stop themselves from only sputtering it out when it’s the dems doing something.

          And after trump if you still believe both sides are the same then you are certifiably brain dead.

        • @Ensign_Crab
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here???

          They understand it and are angry because they’re being called out.

        • @TheDubz87
          link
          -37 months ago

          It’s because I said bad things about Biden, even though I was talking about politicians as a whole. But you can’t say bad things about Biden or be any kind of critical about the current administration without getting trashed on here.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            I mean it was because you’re wrong and your comment was stupid, but enjoy your victimization, I guess!

    • @schnapsman
      link
      -127 months ago

      You know… He ‘hit’ them apparently.

      • @Earthwormjim91
        link
        287 months ago

        Oh and passed an executive order, along with having his justice department pursue more antitrust cases than any other administration.

    • @FakinUpCountryDegen
      link
      -197 months ago

      All he can do is back out his limp-dick economic policies that are destroying the country and creating this problem…but there’s no chance of that.

      This damage is literally the point of the policies. What people don’t understand is that he’s doing this on purpose.