• @iBaz
    link
    1041 year ago

    What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

    • @WeeSheep
      link
      1541 year ago

      Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          421 year ago

          Sorry to be pedantic on the internet (lol) but it might be more accurate to say inflation has slowed.

          • Orbituary
            link
            211 year ago

            Up like a rocket down like a parachute.

            • @TangledHyphae
              link
              51 year ago

              Except the unfortunate part is that it is always increasing, it’s just a derivative, rate of change. But the massive boost from months of heavy inflation is now here permanently, so we’re adding 2-3% on TOP of the already-inflated costs. But that’s not telling the full story, it is the value of the US dollar going down primarily. Buying power is lower by definition, but because of that, everyone on the bottom end is getting squeezed beyond anything they are ready for and it’s going to eventually cause civil unrest on a larger scale.

          • @killeronthecorner
            link
            English
            181 year ago

            He picked two points in time and described a number that was fixed at each instance, so decreased works fine.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Burn the pedant!

            I still think decreased is accurate though, the rate of inflation is significantly smaller today vs then, so the rate has decreased

            • @captainlezbian
              link
              31 year ago

              Yeah if it was deflation that would’ve been a huge deal because our economy is built on an inflationary assumption and deflation would crash it

          • @Serinus
            link
            21 year ago

            The bipartisan PPP (passed under Trump) was insane.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        341 year ago

        lets add taxing the shit out of people who do this to the list.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        How would you like the President of the United States to do that? Do you think the President is a dictator that can just unilaterally pass sweeping legislation? How do you think the public would react if the President had the power to directly determine the prices of goods? How do you think that would go in general?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          The fact this is even in the negatives a tiny bit really demonstrates the typical political intelligence of your average voter.

          You’re of course completely correct, and Biden has indeed done everything he LEGALLY can do, which is probably why we’re suffering far less than a lot of the rest of the developed world economically speaking.

          People just like to shout at the wind, it seems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You’ll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

      Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can’t do that. It’s the consumers that are at fault!

      • @iBaz
        link
        131 year ago

        Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

        • @MsPenguinette
          link
          141 year ago

          He can propose laws to the legislative bramch. He might not be able to pass it himself but he could push and advocate for it

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oh what does it hurt then?

              Can’t say anything, because of the GOP.

              Super cool having a democrat president who’s got no balls. Can’t offend the house.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                What does it hurt? Political capital, for one.

                Also, you don’t just say, “let’s make a law about X”, and a 3,000 page bill just appears in front of you. That shit takes TONS of work. Biden can’t just materialize a workable plan that both parties (in this political climate? lol) will ever agree on.

                That just isn’t how this country works. If you want this to change, Congress has to change it.

                • @rambaroo
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  I love how “political capital” is the neolibs go-to excuse for why the working class can’t be helped. Yet there’s a never ending amount of “political capital” I help giant corporations make more money. Fucking tools

                  • prole
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    3
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    What? Do you think I like that political capital is a thing? It’s fucking gross. I am just acknowledging reality. What do you think the President actually does in the US?

                    Like, do you even realize that you’re advocating for authoritarianism? Or is it OK, as long as it’s the person doing the things you want? And we all know situations like that are super sustainable…

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    “The president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.”

                    I hope you direct all that useless anger you have here on the internet for voting time, then.

                    We just had local elections here nationally in the U.S., whom did you place your vote for to solve this issue?

              • @SCB
                link
                01 year ago

                This is a thread about him saying things.

    • @graymess
      link
      51 year ago

      Price controls are well within the president’s powers. It’s not that radical of a concept.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        It’s within congress’s powers for sure. I don’t think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Why is this upvoted?

        No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

      • @SCB
        link
        -9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Price controls are an extremely radical concept, themselves. Last thing this economy needs is further distortion.

        The sucky thing about inflation is you have to run through it like an illness.

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Windfall taxes. Let them share their gains, that’s the whole point of taxes since society don’t work otherwise.

          • @SCB
            link
            31 year ago

            That’s vastly different from a direct price control, in both intent and effect.

            I’d love to pass lots more taxes but with the current House that’s completely impossible

      • @nutsack
        link
        91 year ago

        ok. but this is factually correct

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you know basic US Civics, or…? Biden has the bully pulpit (basically what he’s doing here), and that’s pretty much it. He can issue executive orders (and has in the past about this), but those are often complete bullshit that’s unenforceable, and will be removed by the next person in the office.

        Take a look at Trump rolling back Obama’s EPA purview over waterways in the US for a recent example that has left over 60% of our nation’s waterways now unprotected.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -91 year ago

          Biden is like dog shit on the bottom of FDR’s shoe. He is weak and pathetic and the only thing he cares about are his corporate donors

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            Lol way to just talk past me. Did you even read the comment?

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            11 year ago

            FDR sicced Federal agencies on a leftist to discredit him.

            Oh the irony.