• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Starfield frustrates me, because in many ways its a major step in the right direction. It has much better roleplaying mechanics than Skyrim or Fallout 4, but at the same time the lore is half-baked and the skill system is fairly weak. It has great potential, but a lot of it feels toned down and less “real” because of it. Space exploration has a lot of potential as well, but setting every objective so far apart on planets ruins exploration by filling it with monotonous procgen.

    That’s why I’m fairly confident that once properly patched, and mods/DLCs are in full swing, it will probably be remembered very fondly despite the release state. It’ll pull a Cyberpunk.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think everything you said here is spot on except the idea Starfield will improve pike Cyberpunk at this point because Bethesda’s attitude really doesn’t indicate that they seem to admit anything needs fixing.

      With that said I doubt many people expected Cyberpunk to do as well later on so you are probably right and I hope you are for the game and genre. I really like the aesthetic of Starfield and want it to succeed.

      I’m just so tired of getting such half baked stuff at release.

      One annoying thing about the “make your own stories” concept is that content us going to be recycled. My followers don’t say anything new or have new things to do etc because it’s all baked in but also on this supposedly open RPG landscape.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        I would agree with you if Bethesda games haven’t always been saved by modders, rather than Beth themselves. If we had to depend on Beth to fix their own game, Skyrim would’ve been abandoned long, long, long ago, same with Fallout 4.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          That’s true and what worries me the most after wanting Starfield to do good. I’ve been playing Starfield for a bit only to find myself moving to Cyberpunk sooner than later lately.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            No harm in waiting for Starfield! It will only get better, while Cyberpunk is largely complete. I loved cyberpunk, especially the DLC.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I hope it does and I think it will but again with the reliance Bethesda puts on the community I’m nervous.

              Anyway I’ve gotten much of the way through at 100 hours and have enjoyed it - definitely got my money’s worth - but I just sort of hit a wall. To be fair you’ll do that with most games but it seems like Stanfield is just bland.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Yeah, Bethesda games have always been… playable, I guess, but hardly any good, without modding, at least as far back as Oblivion. Morrowind was the last game they made that was just good, out of the box, without needing mods.

          So I figured in a year or two Starfield will be good, with mods, just like Oblivion, Skyrim, and Fallout 4 were all bland at best on release, until mods made them good.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            100% I actually think Starfield has the best bones, even if it has the worst meat, so to speak, so adding meat gives it a much higher ceiling in a few years time.

    • bruhduh
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem is that starfield is modern warfare III of Bethesda but people trying to see it as next skyrim, Bethesda ai generated almost all this game and looped it in roguelite shape, the only things evolved is mechanics as you’ve said yourself, and again as you’ve said yourself, this game will be saved by modders

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          The world is now full of technology that used to have real names, but is now called AI so that investors spunk themselves as they high five each other in shareholder meetings.

        • bruhduh
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Oh I’m anti-Bethesda and Bethesda practices, I’m just sure it will eventually be a great game once the community steps in and fixes it. It isn’t an excuse for Bethesda, but rather admiration for the modding community, and an example of why FOSS and a rejection of the profit motive is so good.

        • bruhduh
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          I agree with you) communities solve everything

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          i dont know why people shit on bethesda for “letting modders fix the game”

          i dont really know any other developer that embraces the modding community as much as bethesda does, and i wish other games had the same amount of modding capability that bethesda games do

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            I think it’s fully possible to criticize Bethesda’s incomplete and highly flawed game design and praise their willingness to support the modding community with great tools at the same time.

    • @militaryintelligence
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      When players are tired of paying to be game testers then things will change. Until then, go mine some ore or whatever, I haven’t played it.

      -Bethesda, maybe