Hellfire103 to [email protected]English • 1 year agoWATERsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1568arrow-down120
arrow-up1548arrow-down1imageWATERsopuli.xyzHellfire103 to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squarethreelonmusketeerslinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-21 year ago roughly 2.5 times the hydrogen vs oxygen to account for inefficiencies Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
minus-square@AngryCommieKenderlink2•1 year agoI’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react
Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
I’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react