@Goronmon to GamesEnglish • 10 months agoWhy Bethesda Responding to Starfield's Steam Reviews Is Part of a Rising Games Industry Trendwww.ign.comexternal-linkmessage-square12arrow-up1128arrow-down17
arrow-up1121arrow-down1external-linkWhy Bethesda Responding to Starfield's Steam Reviews Is Part of a Rising Games Industry Trendwww.ign.com@Goronmon to GamesEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square12
minus-squareTalarainelinkfedilink45•10 months agoI think what bothers me the most about the developer responses was that they sounded like Chat GPT. Like you get past the first paragraph and you already know what the whole 4 more paragraphs is gonna say, just in a different way.
minus-squareJJROKCZlinkEnglish71•10 months agoThat’s because marketing/pr people speak just like ChatGPT, just saying a bunch of nothing wasting the oxygen used to voice it
minus-square@acosmichippolinkEnglish4•10 months agokinda like chatGPT is trained on a bunch of PR speak.
minus-squareDarkMetatronlinkfedilinkEnglish15•10 months agoFor me it reads as typical boilerplate text, that can be seen in responses from so many companies. Not really better then ChatGPT but at least there are humans involved in that mindless task.
minus-square@nevemsenkilinkEnglish5•10 months agoPretty much has to be boilerplate tbh, as they can only fish out a response from the preapproved can.
minus-square@SgtAStrawberrylinkEnglish2•10 months agoI would also guess that the reason they sound similar is that a lot of the training data of ChatGPT comes from that type of company texts.
minus-squareiAmTheTotlinkfedilink5•10 months agoIt may very well be Chat GPT, or another generative AI, tbh.
I think what bothers me the most about the developer responses was that they sounded like Chat GPT.
Like you get past the first paragraph and you already know what the whole 4 more paragraphs is gonna say, just in a different way.
That’s because marketing/pr people speak just like ChatGPT, just saying a bunch of nothing wasting the oxygen used to voice it
kinda like chatGPT is trained on a bunch of PR speak.
For me it reads as typical boilerplate text, that can be seen in responses from so many companies.
Not really better then ChatGPT but at least there are humans involved in that mindless task.
Pretty much has to be boilerplate tbh, as they can only fish out a response from the preapproved can.
I would also guess that the reason they sound similar is that a lot of the training data of ChatGPT comes from that type of company texts.
It may very well be Chat GPT, or another generative AI, tbh.