“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • @alvvayson
    link
    101 year ago

    Rationally, you have a valid point.

    But I can totally understand people who can’t bring themselves to vote for someone actively supporting a genocide. Something that Trump didn’t do during his tenure in office.

    Lesser of two evils only works when the distinction is clear to everyone.

    Biden needs to separate himself from Israeli genocidal politics, and it seems his cabinet is trying to shift.

    So in conclusion, you might consider this a publicity stunt. And maybe it is. But recent elections have shown that you can’t ignore your base, you need to fire them up to really turn them out.

    So this is definitely a good move.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But I can totally understand people who can’t bring themselves to vote for someone actively supporting a genocide. Something that Trump didn’t do during his tenure in office.

      Trump provided military assistance, approved arms sales, and personally vetoed a bill to end US military assistance to the Saudis in Yemen which is considered a genocide as well.

      And his Israel “peace plan” was literally just giving the Israelis everything they wanted so if you’re giving him credit for Israel/Palestine actions you’re literally just giving him credit for not being the president when this happened. He absolutely would have been worse for Palestinians, he just didn’t have the power at the time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Then they stay home to vote “neither of the above” or in more active form cast ballot voting for “Mickley mouse” aka foiled ballot.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      31 year ago

      But I can totally understand people who can’t bring themselves to vote for someone actively supporting a genocide. Something that Trump didn’t do during his tenure in office.

      Trump was trying to oppress them personally. Maybe sympathy for those suffering a genocide is more important to them than their own safety, but maybe it shouldn’t be.

      Also, do you really think Trump wouldn’t support Israel killing every last Palestinian they could?

        • Flying Squid
          link
          51 year ago

          The Muslim ban was only oppressing foreign Muslims trying to enter the USA.

          It did not directly oppress US citizens who were Muslim

          Oh, so just the families of those citizens. Gotcha. I’m sure Trump won’t do worse next time.

          Also, that isn’t all he did. He wanted a national registry of Muslim-Americans, for example.

          Please, explain to me how doing that wouldn’t be oppressing them.

    • @Psychodelic
      link
      11 year ago

      …and the American base never fails to show its sheer, utter stupidity.