Mac to Software [email protected] • 1 year ago1080p Universeprogramming.devimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1212arrow-down11
arrow-up1211arrow-down1image1080p Universeprogramming.devMac to Software [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareMacOPlinkfedilink117•1 year agoTriggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
minus-square@FooBarringtonlink15•1 year agoLudicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.
Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.