• MacOP
    link
    fedilink
    1171 year ago

    Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      151 year ago

      Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    441 year ago

    The reason is that we don’t need more. 1080p is what you can observe on a fullHD screen, so there is no need for more.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Well have you counted them?

      I don’t seem to have any particles around here I do have an awful lot of stuff but no particles.

      • Deebster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        I started counting, but my 10-bit counter maxed out. My answer was quite close to Google’s though 👍