• Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    I think corporations should be limited to owning a small quantity of sfh. Maybe a dozen unless they can show a compelling reason such as housing for employees.

    Sfh are meant for families.

    • netburnr
      link
      English
      341 year ago

      We don’t want company towns, there should be no exceptions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Maybe put in a few exceptions for things like remote research or production facilities where no real town or civilization in general exists around them. Basically the kind where rotating worker shifts are stationed for 3-6 months at a time and then move back for a few months off.

      • Riskable
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        You don’t place the limit on the company you place the limit on the region. Just like zoning often requires a certain amount of green space you write regulations that only 10-25% of all single family homes can be owned by corporations.

    • @TheDarkKnight
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Just scale the tax, it’s so fucking easy to fix. But if they wait it’ll become a giant problem where some awful company or groups of company will fail and break the economy for a while etc etc.

      All you have to do is scale the tax. 1 house normal tax rate. 2 houses 2x tax rate on all properties. 3 houses 3x the tax rate on all properties.

      Numbers probably need adjusting but that keeps things reasonable, even for small landlords you can scale it so its fair and keeps properties local and even a good investment vehicle for individuals but prevent it from becoming an exploitive market by giants corps.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        Trump changed salt for personal taxes. Just make the rules cover corporations as well. I got fucked in salt