• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It uses a ton of material to power 73 homes annually (652 feet high and 45 feet in diameter), works best in a desert but requires a lot of water. Yeah, nuclear energy is really threatened by that. Modern microreactors in development make, for example, 1.5 MWe at let’s say 90% capacity factor. Assuming about 1000 kWh/mo for a house, that microreactor, which can fit on the back of a semi truck and be transported down the highway that way, can power 985 homes anually and doesn’t require cooling water (will require water for electrical steam generation).

      Yeah, I will stick with nuclear, thanks.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Nuclear energy isn’t threatened by this. It’s threatened by the fact that it’s impossible to build one at a profit.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            And by the time that concept becomes reality we’ll either be running 100% renewable energy or dead from climate change

              • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Ah, plans! Well then, that’s a guarantee! No way they’ll hit unexpected roadblocks and go massively overbudget like every other nuclear project

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  You should educate yourself about GenIV reactors (designs, supply chains, costs…) before you embarrass yourself.

          • @IchNichtenLichten
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            The cost of electricity from those is even more expensive than from conventional nuclear.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          There are technology (reactor) demonstrations planned within the next 2-3 years, so not quite but very close. A lot of active R&D work going on right now for specific designs at a lot of companies.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -21 year ago

              The technologies on which these reactor designs are based have been demonstrated previously. The specific designs are in progress and well on their way. AGR, EBR-II, and MSRE are examples.

              • @IchNichtenLichten
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                So that’s a no, then?

                WTF is it with nuclear bros and their war on reality?

                  • @IchNichtenLichten
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Maybe, but I’ve had plenty of conversations where I’ve bought evidence, facts, used reliable sources, etc. and I see the same people still lying their asses off.

      • @IchNichtenLichten
        link
        English
        -41 year ago

        You realize that the thing you’re describing doesn’t actually exist and likely never will, right?

        Pro-nuclear folks are so weird.