• @robolemmy
    link
    401 year ago

    I really hate reportage like this. Every government, even seemingly incompetent ones like the current crop in the UK, have hundreds or thousands of contingency plans for things of wildly varying likelihood. This is just one of those things.

    This is just as informative as those articles that say eating sugar triggers the same receptors as cocaine. Yes it’s true, but there aren’t that many reward mechanisms in the brain, so a lot of shit hits those same receptors.

    It’s data and it’s true, but it’s not useful information.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      We have a plan to invade literally every country and for if that country invades us that is updated regularly. I always found that kind of funny but it isn’t shocking.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Why would it be funny?

        Having a plan for an unlikely event is not funny if having such a plan is your job. There are plenty of people who should do exactly that.

        Because not having a plan for an unlikely event that bloody happens is, eh, negatively funny.

    • @dustedhands
      link
      41 year ago

      It’s like saying the police is preparing for thieves robbing the bank or the fire department preparing for a wildfire. It’s part of their job and it would be stranger not to have a contingency plan.

    • @indetermin8
      link
      01 year ago

      Consider the source. Pretty sure this is propaganda.