The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

read more: https://www.semafor.com/article/12/08/2023/un-security-council-votes-on-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-amid-israel-hamas-conflict

    • @meco03211
      link
      101 year ago

      Well that’s dumb. But rules are rules.

        • @meco03211
          link
          131 year ago

          It was more meant that they couldn’t vote no then not veto. That being the case they should have at least abstained like the UK.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        It’s to prevent nuclear war. If everyone voted to invade or harshly punish a powerful country they could respond.

        • davel [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          371 year ago

          That is the explanation I was given, but these days I think that’s more of a rationalization than an explanation. Closer to the truth, I think, is that those are the countries that came out of WWII the victors, and so they wrote the rules.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Much like the US Constitution, the structure of the UN is built for a world that no longer exists.

        • Herbal Gamer
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          oh so the only ones who ever used nukes now get to say what everyone should do with theirs?