The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

read more: https://www.semafor.com/article/12/08/2023/un-security-council-votes-on-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-amid-israel-hamas-conflict

  • @meco03211
    link
    101 year ago

    Well that’s dumb. But rules are rules.

      • @meco03211
        link
        131 year ago

        It was more meant that they couldn’t vote no then not veto. That being the case they should have at least abstained like the UK.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      It’s to prevent nuclear war. If everyone voted to invade or harshly punish a powerful country they could respond.

      • davel [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        371 year ago

        That is the explanation I was given, but these days I think that’s more of a rationalization than an explanation. Closer to the truth, I think, is that those are the countries that came out of WWII the victors, and so they wrote the rules.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Much like the US Constitution, the structure of the UN is built for a world that no longer exists.

      • Herbal Gamer
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        oh so the only ones who ever used nukes now get to say what everyone should do with theirs?