The US indicated it would veto the motion at the United Nations Security Council, arguing a ceasefire could leave Hamas in charge of the territory while still holding more than 100 hostages.
why do all the people who use concern for hamas as a reason to avoid a ceasefire never point out that netanyahu and likud are the reason hamas were funded and in power
why do all the people who use concern for hamas as a reason to avoid a ceasefire never point out that netanyahu and likud are the reason hamas were funded and in power
Because it is absolutely devastating to their argument for wonton retaliation.
Wanton. Wonton retaliation sounds yummy
Dunno, it sounds like Chinese cuisine’s equivalent to the post-Curry Bonanza/ring of fire.