Hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars have been spent on what was sold as a revolution in transparency and accountability. Instead, police departments routinely refuse to release footage — even when officers kill.

When Barbara and Belvett Richards learned that the police had killed their son, they couldn’t understand it. How, on that September day in 2017, did their youngest child come to be shot in his own apartment by officers from the New York Police Department?

Miguel Richards, who was 31, grew up in Jamaica and had moved to New York about a year earlier after coming to the United States through a work-study program. His father’s friend gave him a job doing office work, and he rented a room in the Bronx. But he started to struggle, becoming reclusive and skipping days of work. His mother, with whom he was particularly close, pleaded with him to return to Jamaica. “It’s as if I sensed something was going to happen,” she says. “I was calling him, calling him, calling him: ‘Miguel, come home. Come home.’”

His parents knew he had never been violent, had never been arrested and had never had any issues with the police. What details they managed to gather came from the Bronx district attorney: Richards’ landlord, who hadn’t seen him for weeks, asked the police to check on him. The officers who responded found Richards standing still in his own bedroom, holding a small folding knife. And 15 minutes later, they shot him.

  • @Dethedrus
    link
    English
    421 year ago

    Here’s a thought. Qualified immunity goes bye bye every time they have an oopsie with their body cams. Suddenly no more oopsies!

    Oh wait, that will never ever happen.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      351 year ago

      Imagine a country where the police union wasn’t the only union the government ever got behind.

      • @Dethedrus
        link
        English
        191 year ago

        First I would have to imagine a police force that didn’t start primarily as slave catchers. Or state funded union busters.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Qualified Immunity is illegal to begin with according to the original text of Section 1983 of the federal code. 16 words were edited out when someone “copied” the law into the Federal Register. The Congressional Record still has the original wording.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html

      Harlow V Fitzgerald should have gone the other way.

      Edit: the next time SCOTUS hears any immunity related cases, we should flood them with amicus briefs about this.

    • @NateNate60
      link
      31 year ago

      Some localities allow ballot initiatives that all legislation to be enacted by referendum. See if there are any ballot initiative petitions for that in your locality and sign them. If not, start one.

      Be the change you want to see.