Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving | A visual indicator for other drivers::undefined

  • XenGi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    545 months ago

    Even if this would be a good idea, you can’t just put some non regulated lights on a car. This would need a law change in Germany to be approved and would probably take years of burocrazy until she get beards figured out the exact hue these lights need to emit. But I guess Mercedes already wrote that law for our government to copy. How convenient.

    • @KISSmyOS
      link
      English
      32
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Tangent5280
        link
        English
        75 months ago

        I dont understand, does benz have leverage in the german government?

        • @KISSmyOS
          link
          English
          21
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          It’s a bit of a meme because german politics is so heavily lobbied by our car industry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      305 months ago

      But I guess Mercedes already wrote that law for our government to copy. How convenient.

      How dare a company try to work with governments to create a new safety feature!

      • @FMT99
        link
        English
        -55 months ago

        How is this a safety feature though? Are they saying we have to be extra careful around self-driving cars? If so then the car shouldn’t be considered to be self-driving. If not, then what’s the use?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I see a lot of people in this thread saying a car that needs any kind of indication of self-driving isn’t safe enough to be on the road, but that implies a single answer to questions like “is it safe enough?” In reality, different people will answer that question differently and their answer will change over time. I see it as a good thing to try to accommodate people who view self-driving cars as unsafe even when they are street-legal. So it’s not really a safety feature from all perspectives, but it is from the perspective of people who want to be extra cautious around those cars.

          Personally I see an argument for self-driving cars that aren’t as safe as a average human driver. It’s basically the same reason you sometimes see cars with warning signs about student drivers: we wouldn’t consider student drivers safe enough to drive except that it’s a necessary part of producing safe drivers. Self-driving cars are the same, except that instead of individual drivers, its self-driving technology that we expect to improve and eventually become safer than human drivers.

          Another way to to look at it is that there are a lot of drivers who are below-average in their driving safety for a variety of reasons, but we still consider them safe enough to drive. Think of people who are tired, emotional, distracted, ill, etc. It would be nice to have the same warning lights for those drivers, but since that’s not practical, having them only for self-driving cars is better than nothing.

        • @froh42
          link
          English
          35 months ago

          Different regulations apply for the driver when the car is autonomous vs controlled by a driver.

          These lights do not indicate driving assists like Tesla’s autopilot but full level 3 and above autonomy. In level 3 for example, Mercedes is responsible for any damages due to accidents - not the driver.

          Also in level 3 the driver may legally use their phone, which is illegal for a car driver normally and give them a ticket.

          So there IS a legal requirement to find out about the autonomy level of a car from outside.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      255 months ago

      Either way, it’s a useful starting point for the conversation to be had I guess.

      Better for some proactivity then nobody ever progressing anything, right?

    • @RagingRobot
      link
      English
      125 months ago

      So should companies not try to innovate or invent things until the German government tells them it’s ok?

      • XenGi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        The point is that innovation should always come with regulations. This is not the wild west over here. We like to be alive and companies usually don’t care about that but only care about profits. So it’s a good idea that they can’t just do whatever they want. If they invent something actually new I’m quite happy that a third party will have a look at it before it’s mounted to a vehicle that kills me. I know that in the us this is handled the other way around but I guess the statistics for car accidents agrees with me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          If Mercedes only cared about profits why would they be putting this light on their cars?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      No law change needed, the StZVO is a mere decree. Also EU law takes precedence Mercedes probably isn’t even going to bother getting it through German bureaucracy but will go straight to Brussels.

    • @Mango
      link
      English
      25 months ago

      Ever see neons?

        • @Mango
          link
          English
          25 months ago

          I’ve heard a lot about how Germans are strict with their driving laws, but I never expected them to be straight boring for no good reason.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            It’s about traffic safety. Also rest assured German tuners have plenty of fun overtaking stock Porsches with their tuned Golfs on the Autobahn.

            • @Mango
              link
              English
              25 months ago

              Yeah I suppose neon lights is marginally less safe than chugging my drink too fast.

    • Dem Bosain
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      This would not be illegal in the US, except some states forbid blue lights because they’re reserved for law enforcement. I haven’t seen any state regulation that rigorously defines “blue” like the NHTSA references to CIE 1931.

      They would also have to be distinct enough to not cause confusion with the existing lights.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -15 months ago

      Gosh how could the world function without legislature having long sessions to decide which color some safety lights should emit.