@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-21 year agoi <3 statisticsmander.xyzimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1747arrow-down126file-text
arrow-up1721arrow-down1imagei <3 statisticsmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-21 year agomessage-square93fedilinkfile-text
Disclaimer: This is a joke. Ecofascism is obviously bad, kids. Don’t be that guy. https://theconversation.com/8-billion-people-why-trying-to-control-the-population-is-often-futile-and-harmful-194369
minus-square@AngryCommieKenderlinkEnglish7•1 year agoWell it did cause the first and largest mass extinction event so far…
minus-square@benjimanlinkEnglish1•1 year agoSure but anthropogenic climate change is an issue of greenhouse gas accumulation rather than a lack of oxygen, no? Rather than there being too many people literally just using too much oxygen.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoCO^2 production consumes oxygen from the atmosphere; Carbon capture that doesn’t make oxygen will leave that issue alive and well.
minus-square@AngryCommieKenderlinkEnglish1•1 year agoI was joking. We wouldn’t be alive if that particular extinction even hadn’t happened.
Well it did cause the first and largest mass extinction event so far…
Sure but anthropogenic climate change is an issue of greenhouse gas accumulation rather than a lack of oxygen, no? Rather than there being too many people literally just using too much oxygen.
CO^2 production consumes oxygen from the atmosphere; Carbon capture that doesn’t make oxygen will leave that issue alive and well.
I was joking. We wouldn’t be alive if that particular extinction even hadn’t happened.