• @kadu
    link
    -21
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @EndlessApollo
      link
      611 months ago

      There’s truly nothing more disgraceful or abominable than not censoring out a tiny baby dick on the cover of an album, clearly this album was just made by and for pedophiles :c

      • @kadu
        link
        211 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • @superbirra
        link
        -111 months ago

        I don’t think that the comment you reply to intended this, yours looks like a silly strawman

        • @EndlessApollo
          link
          811 months ago

          Idk, it sure sounds to me like this person thinks this album cover is equivalent to child porn. If I’m wrong I’m sorry, I’ve just seen a lot of weird prudes think a naked baby is sexual and should never be seen by anyone ever

          • @superbirra
            link
            311 months ago

            I think the meaning was ‘entire books of kid nudes aren’t restricted because existing laws, so there is no way such a cover would’ and tbh we think we’re all on the same page by thinking the case around this cover is complete bullshit

            • @EndlessApollo
              link
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              That’s prob a good explanation, I should give them the benefit of the doubt and not just get aggressive over misinterpreted stuff :c again sorry kadu if that wasn’t your intent, you’re definitely right I agree, this seems like a ridiculous and not legally justified thing to stir up shit about every few years, but idk a lot of the context so maybe this person is a victim of some kind of abuse for all I know (other than stuff experienced by a lot of child stars, which they might’ve wound up being Idk)

          • @kadu
            link
            211 months ago

            deleted by creator