If 100 homeless people were given $750 per month for a year, no questions asked, what would they spend it on?

That question was at the core of a controlled study conducted by a San Francisco-based nonprofit and the USC Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work.

The results were so promising that the researchers decided to publish results after only six months. The answer: food, 36.6%; housing, 19.5%; transportation, 12.7%; clothing, 11.5%; and healthcare, 6.2%, leaving only 13.6% uncategorized.

Those who got the stipend were less likely to be unsheltered after six months and able to meet more of their basic needs than a control group that got no money, and half as likely as the control group to have an episode of being unsheltered.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20231221131158/https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-12-19/750-a-month-no-questions-asked-improved-the-lives-of-homeless-people

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    39 months ago

    This was my initial reaction also, but taking a closer look the article doesn’t say anything about UBI. This is not a UBI experiment.

    • Melllvar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      A fair point. But it looks, swims, and quacks like a UBI experiment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Not really, you can’t criticise it for not being like UBI while saying it’s similar to UBI even if it does not purport to be UBI.