Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

  • @A_Random_Idiot
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Foo Fighters used to be real down with the whole AIDS denialism, even financially supporting it.

    I know David Grohl is an internet sweetheart, but every time I see anything Foo related, I just immediately wonder how many people died pointless and preventable deaths because they believed the denialism Foo Fighters pushed.

    • Zoolander
      link
      English
      1911 months ago

      To be fair, it wasn’t Dave’s idea or something he supported. It was bassist Nate Mendel’s message that they were, admittedly, amplifying. Even the info on their website had a disclaimer that listed it as “being displayed at the request of Nate Mendel”.

      I think they all regret being involved in amplifying that message too, including Nate. In the 20 years since they initially broke support with the people involved, they’ve played several shows in support of HIV/AIDS awareness groups, fundraised for Elton John’s AIDS Foundation, and every tour they do now has some kind of fundraising or auctions to support AIDS education or LGBTQIA+ rights.

      It feels like they know now, in hindsight of course, that it was harmful and have at least tried to do more good to make up for it. Mendel was even quoted saying that the only reason he did it was because he thought he was helping people, not hurting them.

      • @A_Random_Idiot
        link
        English
        -611 months ago

        To be fair, it wasn’t Dave’s idea or something he supported.

        And yet he kept mendel in the band, and had the message plastered on their website.

        Thats not something you get to handwave away with even the grossest incompetence claim.

        Mendel was even quoted saying that the only reason he did it was because he thought he was helping people, not hurting them.

        I mean, yeah. he likes his career, of course he says that.

        • Zoolander
          link
          English
          911 months ago

          No one is hand waving anything away. Nate is a member of the band. The message on the website was clear that it was his message.

          You make it seem like people can’t change their views based on new information. It’s not like they could go back in time and not do those things after the fact. They’ve done far more in support of AIDS education. It’s not fair to vilify them for something they did for a few years while ignoring everything they’ve done since for more than 20 years.

          • @A_Random_Idiot
            link
            English
            -9
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You make it seem like people can’t change their views based on new information.

            I never said or implied that.

            I said you cant handwave away or excuse Grohls involvement, and that a person who values their career has an incentive to say a certain thing after being called out for being a piece of shit.

            Anything beyond that is just your fiction.

            • chingadera
              link
              1411 months ago

              If you’re gonna argue with people, you don’t get to just skip parts of their argument without it being noticed. Don’t be a chickenshit. The point theyre making is obvious and valid

            • Zoolander
              link
              English
              1011 months ago

              Except you did. You’re literally on a discussion where you posted Dave Grohl because of something he was a part of for maybe 2 or 3 years that wasn’t even his idea to begin with while ignoring everything he’s done for 20+ years since.

              And now you’re being dishonest about it.

              • @A_Random_Idiot
                link
                English
                -111 months ago

                Foo Fighters used to be real down with the whole AIDS denialism, even financially supporting it.

                See that?

                where I said used to? in past tense? as in not current?

                And now you’re being dishonest about it.

                My friend. I really wish you would step away from the computer and take a slow, deep breath. I’m sorry you cant handle your favorite person doing something bad, but its no reason for you to be this upset and go around inventing whole narratives as justification to project your anger at me.

                • Zoolander
                  link
                  English
                  211 months ago

                  Why does it always have to go to extremes immediately with you people? They are not “my favorite person”. None of them. You are not my friend. Not in the slightest. I’m not inventing a narrative. It is a fact that this was all done at Nate’s request and that the amount of time the support existed is dwarfed by the amount of time they’ve supported AIDS education after realizing it was a mistake. You’re the one basically saying it’s unforgivable, that people can’t change their minds, and are inventing a narrative. You’re just projecting. Stop. Just admit that you mischaracterized it and that what you said wasn’t accurate and be done with it.

                  • @A_Random_Idiot
                    link
                    English
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Sure buddy. Whatever you need to believe to sleep at night. If I need to be the big bad evil man for that, then you make me whatever you need me to be.

                    Just calm down so you don’t put yourself in the ER for christmas.