Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

  • Zoolander
    link
    English
    199 months ago

    To be fair, it wasn’t Dave’s idea or something he supported. It was bassist Nate Mendel’s message that they were, admittedly, amplifying. Even the info on their website had a disclaimer that listed it as “being displayed at the request of Nate Mendel”.

    I think they all regret being involved in amplifying that message too, including Nate. In the 20 years since they initially broke support with the people involved, they’ve played several shows in support of HIV/AIDS awareness groups, fundraised for Elton John’s AIDS Foundation, and every tour they do now has some kind of fundraising or auctions to support AIDS education or LGBTQIA+ rights.

    It feels like they know now, in hindsight of course, that it was harmful and have at least tried to do more good to make up for it. Mendel was even quoted saying that the only reason he did it was because he thought he was helping people, not hurting them.

    • @A_Random_Idiot
      link
      English
      -69 months ago

      To be fair, it wasn’t Dave’s idea or something he supported.

      And yet he kept mendel in the band, and had the message plastered on their website.

      Thats not something you get to handwave away with even the grossest incompetence claim.

      Mendel was even quoted saying that the only reason he did it was because he thought he was helping people, not hurting them.

      I mean, yeah. he likes his career, of course he says that.

      • Zoolander
        link
        English
        99 months ago

        No one is hand waving anything away. Nate is a member of the band. The message on the website was clear that it was his message.

        You make it seem like people can’t change their views based on new information. It’s not like they could go back in time and not do those things after the fact. They’ve done far more in support of AIDS education. It’s not fair to vilify them for something they did for a few years while ignoring everything they’ve done since for more than 20 years.

        • @A_Random_Idiot
          link
          English
          -9
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You make it seem like people can’t change their views based on new information.

          I never said or implied that.

          I said you cant handwave away or excuse Grohls involvement, and that a person who values their career has an incentive to say a certain thing after being called out for being a piece of shit.

          Anything beyond that is just your fiction.

          • chingadera
            link
            149 months ago

            If you’re gonna argue with people, you don’t get to just skip parts of their argument without it being noticed. Don’t be a chickenshit. The point theyre making is obvious and valid

          • Zoolander
            link
            English
            109 months ago

            Except you did. You’re literally on a discussion where you posted Dave Grohl because of something he was a part of for maybe 2 or 3 years that wasn’t even his idea to begin with while ignoring everything he’s done for 20+ years since.

            And now you’re being dishonest about it.

            • @A_Random_Idiot
              link
              English
              -19 months ago

              Foo Fighters used to be real down with the whole AIDS denialism, even financially supporting it.

              See that?

              where I said used to? in past tense? as in not current?

              And now you’re being dishonest about it.

              My friend. I really wish you would step away from the computer and take a slow, deep breath. I’m sorry you cant handle your favorite person doing something bad, but its no reason for you to be this upset and go around inventing whole narratives as justification to project your anger at me.

              • Zoolander
                link
                English
                29 months ago

                Why does it always have to go to extremes immediately with you people? They are not “my favorite person”. None of them. You are not my friend. Not in the slightest. I’m not inventing a narrative. It is a fact that this was all done at Nate’s request and that the amount of time the support existed is dwarfed by the amount of time they’ve supported AIDS education after realizing it was a mistake. You’re the one basically saying it’s unforgivable, that people can’t change their minds, and are inventing a narrative. You’re just projecting. Stop. Just admit that you mischaracterized it and that what you said wasn’t accurate and be done with it.

                • @A_Random_Idiot
                  link
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Sure buddy. Whatever you need to believe to sleep at night. If I need to be the big bad evil man for that, then you make me whatever you need me to be.

                  Just calm down so you don’t put yourself in the ER for christmas.

                  • Zoolander
                    link
                    English
                    29 months ago

                    LOL. Yeah… you’re the big bad evil end guy in all of our lives. You’re more delusional than I thought.

                  • @straypet
                    cake
                    link
                    19 months ago

                    You’re not a big bad whatever, just an idiot.