I found this its the cheapest 10TB Exos drive on Newegg and looking to buy 4 of them. I will be putting them in my NAS that I use for my media library and pc backups. The price I’m posting this is $130, I’m also looking similar Exos drives that are $250 is there a difference? Should I shell up for the more expensive drives?

  • @TCB13
    link
    English
    331 year ago

    That should be a choice of the OS / controller card not of the drive itself. Also what datacenter wants to run drives that don’t report half of the SMART data just because they felt like it?

    • Victor
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 year ago

      Data centers replace drives when they fail and that’s about it. They don’t care much about SMART data.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        We used to use smart data to predict when to order new drives and on really bad looking days increase our redundancy. Nothing like getting a bad series of drives for PB of data to make you paranoid I guess.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          What kind of attributes did you find relevant? I imagine the 19x codes…

          I’ve read the Blackblaze statistics and I’m using a tool (Scrutiny) that takes those stats into account for computing failure probability, but at the end of the day the most reliable tell is when a drive gets kicked out of an array (and/or can’t pass the long smart test anymore).

          Meanwhile, I have drives with “lesser” attributes sitting on warning values (like command timeout) and ofc I monitor them and have good drives on standby, but they still seem to chug along fine for now.