• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1061 year ago

    A 1080TI still plays every release at medium or higher settings. /shrug

    Unless you’re worried about 4k or VR, I wouldn’t upgrade anyway.

    • @schmidtster
      link
      181 year ago

      If you care about refresh rate it matters, not a lot of people can stand 30-40fps with hard drops to single digits just to be able to play a game.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        I’m curious. What game do you think drops to single digits fps on medium settings with a 1080TI?

        I was playing Darktide on a 1060 with minimum 30fps recently, and that game is optimized like absolute trash.

        • @schmidtster
          link
          71 year ago

          Starfield.

          1080 is the minimum card, the TI is decently more powerful (30%), but you’ve got to make concessions on medium to get 30fps, and there’s drops.

          • @Viking_Hippie
            link
            201 year ago

            To be fair though, that’s a VERY new game and they cared so little about optimizing it that they went out and said “you’re probably going to need a new computer to play this” …

            I hear the 1080ti runs Doom just fine 😛

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My 1070 handled Doom Eternal just fine with pretty high settings. I’m sure it helps that I only use a single 1080p monitor for games, but it was still pretty enough for me.

              *Edit - I picked up on the sarcasm after posting this reply. Oh well.

            • @schmidtster
              link
              21 year ago

              Every release means every release, and the requirements aren’t going to get lower. It’s a great card and I know people hate losing it, but it’s on its last legs and likely won’t be able to play new releases at all next year.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            That’s Bethesda’s fault. There is no fucking reason that game can’t run well on a 1080ti for how mediocre it looks.

        • Psaldorn
          link
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Cod MW2/3 are total crapshoots with frame rates, even on a 3080 and set to performance it can still just turn to crap. It seems to run more stable and on higher settings on 2070 laptop. I don’t understand. (I tried to get as much hardware running DMZ as possible for friends and family, lots of machines)

    • @banneryear1868
      link
      71 year ago

      I actually prefer the crisp edges without as much post-processing effects sometimes. Source engine games look great to me, just minimal crisp and clean geometry. I find a lot of modern graphics distracting, but it depends on the game. I do love really pushing graphics for a game like Skyrim.

      • @spader312
        link
        71 year ago

        Modern game engines don’t use the amazing SSAA (super sampling anti aliasing). Most have post processing anti aliasing like FXAA or TXAA which always makes edges look fuzzy. Source engine is one of those that still supports super sampling

        • @banneryear1868
          link
          41 year ago

          Yeah that’s exactly it, MSAA isn’t too bad but FXAA makes edges look pretty blurry. Temporal anti aliasing is also really blurry looking sometimes but gives the impression that the edges could be crisp.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I do 4k and VR on my 1080Ti with no issues, on the highest settings, too. That said, I don’t do a lot of AAA gaming, so take that as you will.

    • Khrux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My 980ti is still a toss up between amazing or mediocre performance. The big issue is that I bought it for £600 which is a lot of money to me, and new GPUs are 3 times that, or more.