@CombatWombatEsq to Fuck CarsEnglish • 9 months agoIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.commessage-square217arrow-up1320arrow-down1160cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1160arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.com@CombatWombatEsq to Fuck CarsEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square217cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@AA5BlinkEnglish8•9 months agoPersonally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•9 months agoIt costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
minus-square@duffmanlinkEnglish-3•9 months agoYou just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-29 months agoDude. Fucking context: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoIt’ll cost them the election, that’s what
Personally I do think that’s the real reason behind right on red: saving money for towns who don’t want to invest in more complicated traffic lights. Trading increased injuries for saving a little money
It costs nothing to make people wait for a green.
You just listed the cost. Time. Another is reduced thouroughput/increased traffic.
Dude. Fucking context:
It’ll cost them the election, that’s what