• @assassin_aragorn
    link
    English
    111 months ago

    Those are certainly difficulties that we’ll need to address. The plutonium especially. I think we could design ways however to keep it secure. It would certainly need to be carefully designed though.

    • partial_accumen
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      We certainly could. We do it already today in the USA with our nuclear weapons (which use Plutonium). Its all possible, its just expensive. So much so that it makes an expensive power source (nuclear) even more expensive. Why would we do this when solar costs 5 times less than regular civilian nuclear power?

      • @assassin_aragorn
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        There’s no magic bullet to our problems. Solar has issues with storage and varies day to day with the weather. I’ve got no issue making it a large supply of our energy, but we’ll need generation sources for cloudy days. We can’t presume the battery storage will be full every time we need it and it’s cloudy out.

        • partial_accumen
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          Who’s suggesting there’s a magic bullet? Certainly not me.

          I’ve got no issue making it a large supply of our energy, but we’ll need generation sources for cloudy days. We can’t presume the battery storage will be full every time we need it and it’s cloudy out.

          My argument is that nuclear isn’t it.

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            Fair enough – what do you propose we use instead?

            • partial_accumen
              link
              English
              111 months ago

              Solar PV, wind, and hydro where we can. Geothermal in the very few places we can.

              Combined cycle gas-turbine (CCGT) methane everywhere else.