@Rapidcreek to TechnologyEnglish • 1 year agoIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square126arrow-up1199arrow-down140cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1159arrow-down1external-linkIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.com@Rapidcreek to TechnologyEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square126cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@cosmicrookielinkEnglish33•edit-21 year agoWhy don’t we just skip 6G and just go straight to 7G
minus-squareMeeechlinkEnglish9•1 year agoIf they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
minus-square@HulelinkEnglish5•1 year agoI mean, you might have a point there. If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine. But… But… Seven ate nine. You ate eight! Seven nine! Waaaahhh!
minus-square@ridethisbikelinkEnglish5•1 year agoNah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
minus-squareParanomalylinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoThey’ll skip 9 as that seems to be Kryptonite to tech. Both Microsoft and Apple decided to skip straight from 8 to 10 with Windows and iPhone respectively.
Why don’t we just skip 6G and just go straight to 7G
If they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
I mean, you might have a point there.
If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine.
But… But… Seven ate nine.
You ate eight!
Seven nine!
Waaaahhh!
Nah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
They’ll skip 9 as that seems to be Kryptonite to tech. Both Microsoft and Apple decided to skip straight from 8 to 10 with Windows and iPhone respectively.