“The court has scrambled to remove the document, but the damage is done; reporters and Sony’s competition have already downloaded all the documents while they were in the public domain.”
The document was publicly available, typically this is via PACER. Once notified, the court was required to pull the document which they did. None of this indicates who did the poor redactions.
The article stated that the court scrambled to undo the damage, which implied the court was responsible for the redaction.
“The court has scrambled to remove the document, but the damage is done; reporters and Sony’s competition have already downloaded all the documents while they were in the public domain.”
The document was publicly available, typically this is via PACER. Once notified, the court was required to pull the document which they did. None of this indicates who did the poor redactions.
Ahh I see you’re point. Thanks for catching and correcting!